My last advices cum warnings to uncle J.
Please keep in mind, I don't wish to tease or disrespect you, dear uncle or dear elder or dear cave-man .
the eightfold path, as means of path for release, requires perfection in virtue, build on right view (which incl. saṃvega, renouncing incl.). The virtue section end with right livelihood, of which the perfect one would be the life of a "beggar".
If there is no right livelihood, there can be no perfection in virtue. Maybe Nyom likes to investigate the factor right livelihood a little: Right Livelihood (samma-ajivo) .
Points to be noted my-lord(••••• bhakti-marga starts, pretending to be in court of dhamma).
perfect one would be the life of a "beggar"
•••perfection in virtue, build on right view (which incl. saṃvega, renouncing incl.)
Completely in wrong direction.....blind faith-cum-observation.
These 2 statements can only be made by one-sided meditator, one who gives preference to "beggar" life only .... like traditional brahmins.
Is uncle perfectly established on right-householdness to claim 1st point?
These 8 parts are interdependent on each other. Only a gem(lord of my-lord)can claim perfect establishment.
Has uncle attained enough virtues, enough merits to quickly gain enlightenment?
I hope, uncle knows that such is not the case otherwise uncle knows already basics to go for addhitthana till enlightenment.
My-lord, would I still have to listen to these blind-arguments, if argumentor is to be sent to a realm of "do physical work, earn money and eat"........ i.e. no support for begging, untill one is not physically/mentally handicapped.
Next point my-lord.
Because it's actually mostly difficult to chance ones livelihood into one fitting into Dhamma, there has been this "economy of the Noble Ones " established by the Buddha.
So, it has come down to this now, my-lord.
People think that to establish in dhamma, one needs to neglect others..... Ha! That's why I wonder why has there not been any venerable for past 2500-2600/- years.••••••
doing, "eating food, wearing clothes, using technologies, etc. household activities" and in-return providing "seemingly-blind-traditional-bounded-version-of" my-lord. ISN'T THIS A TRADE .
Challenge to everyone on earth that keep following vinaya with "no-ordination to physically-disabled", etc. types of neglectings and get enlightened.......
It WILL never happen.
The other part of Nyoms post isn't really worthy to sacrifices much thoughts orarguments into and can be abound if certain faith allows such.
So, is uncle saying that he is above faith, my-lord.
If such is the case, why is he still unable to remove attachment to hi-fi techs?
Why is he still living a householder life in a cave?
If he is really above faiths, then he must have gone beyond NAIVSANGYAA-NASANGYAAYATAN (नैवसंज्ञा- नासंज्ञायतन) phase. If so, then my-lord, uncle must have progressed in realization of 4 noble truths, got enlightened••• as he has already knowledge of basics.
Dear uncle,
Start step by step, leave hi-fi tech, be a real cave-man, be a real-beggar, speak/write only what has been realized as "seemingly-right"... then, before or after(only for you) speaking/writing, self-judge it with arguments. Think from every perspective, .... Moments where bla-bla starts, thinking is nothing more than a noise, entry into "attainments" will start.
:::::::::::::::::::::
Right-livelihood?
? Ha!
:::::::::::::::::::::
My-lord, even suttas tease many householders,... like teasing soldiers & handicapped for their livelihood and instead of providing them path to reach right livelihood, they have been banned from ordination.
:::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::
My-lord, I remember that, life story of my-lords's lord says that venerable spend a lot of time too in teaching previous-dependent relations about livelihood for kings, for head of soldiers, for soldiers, where are they my-lord? Where are they?
Still, blind-people claiming to be my-lord's follower teases others through blind-vinaya.
And not only this my-lord, these people even
FIGHT over respect-disrespect of a bhikkhu.
Really!! Basic definition of a monk/bhikkhu is ...
One who doesn't give a damn about naam-rupa.... means not to put focus on respect-disrespect.
::::::::::::::::::::::::
My-lord, rest of the uncle's writing seems to be from different perspective?
In short, demerit occurs only when, person starts speaking like i am doing in this post...... not good for "someone aspiring to be a muni".
please, pardon my offences-- various hosts of various***....
Taking my leave now to have some(a long) quiet and peaceful time.
(
Admin, please feel free to delete or ban(if i would have access, i would have deleted.... for betterment of seemingly-sangha) my account because next time, I might use some more harsh words which are not suitable for traditional-bounded-ones.)
my-lord.