Buddhist Digital Resource Center removes heritage from the Sangha

[Dhammañāṇa]

Aramika  

Dieses neue Thema (bzw. diese/r Beitrag/e) wurde  aus abgetrennten Beiträgen, ursprünglich in Buddhist Digital Resource Center gave resources toward the Sangha , hinzugefügt. Für ev. ergänzende Informationen zur sehen Sie bitte das Ursprugsthema ein. Anumodana!

The new topic (or post/s) here are originaly from Buddhist Digital Resource Center gave resources toward the Sangha . For eventual additionally information: please visit also the Topic of origin. Anumodana!

[Original post:]

Sadly it's another common act of undertaking of depriving the Sangha from it's heritage... and so my person will not be able to forward and share previous gift.

My person had returned the offer.

Good Master Philip and team of BDRC,

may person just came across that you release, give, texts, the Dhamma, of the Sangha under a license called C00.

May good master be aware that the Dhamma is heritage of the Sangha, and it's not rightly possible to make such a heritage common good (which, forthermore, can be used for every purpose).
Although such activities, similar of plunder in the west, centuries ago, are very common, yes simply common, itjs actually heavy Kamma, whether aware or not, and based on strong wrong view. Depriving the Sangha from it's means would require to turn down the bowl.

My person urges good master Philip and his team to quickly set measures that such maybe not really considered would not lead to long burdens for you and many.

In the case members of the Sangha gave you such allowance, may good master be aware that they already do no more count as members of the Sangha. Furthermore it is total agains the Dhamma and Vinaya to receive donations and/or making a living in exchange on the Dhamma, since it would lead simply to the corruption of it as well as many, many bad deeds.

May good master Philip and his team understand this urgency as an act of compassion, and of cause, as a matter of circumstances, my person here now returns the offer to make use of your undertakings means.

May you act wise and abound the common for you and many's long benefit.

It's a clear disrespects, disregard and simply plunder to put the Buddhas teaching, and heritage under C00 or what ever licence:

    The person who associated a work (Dhamma) with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.

    You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work (Dhamma), even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. See Other Information below.

This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.

Other Information

    In no way are the patent or trademark rights of any person affected by CC0, nor are the rights that other persons may have in the work or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.

[Dhammañāṇa]

Seeing the urgency also in relation to Undertaking to copy-steal Khmer Tipitaka by SC-monks and the danger of possible bad informed, Atma thought it's good to address the good Minister of culture and fine art and the good King's Servant in charge of copy issues for getting aware and aware, acting like thinking goog for long term happiness of many, via email, which hopefully arives and find it's urgency.

[Dhammañāṇa]

Good master Philip , surely well meant and possible thinking that my person isn't aware of circumstances, and especially the difference between holding on rights via on duties, when approaching Dhamna-Vinaya or laws truthfully, send an replay:

Dear Samana,

I appreciate the concerns you raise and want to clarify misconceptions. The
texts are designated as being in the public domain not CC0. Public domain
status is determined by law not by BDRC. The CC0 designation applies to the
metadata associated with the texts and does not apply to the texts
themselves. Furthermore, the CC0 designation is the most liberal
designation we can apply to copyrightable materials (no rights reserved)
and makes them as open as possible under the law. You can read about the
CC0 designation
here: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/.
Additionally, access to our library is 100% free so we do not seek to
profit from our library.

We collaborate with local Buddhists to preserve their texts so that the
Sangha can have their old and irreplaceable texts for as long as possible.
We are a non-profit and our greatest support comes from Buddhists. Any
solicitation of donations that we make is purely to cover expenses, is not
profit-directed, and is necessary to preserve the texts and make them
freely available to the Sangha via our library.

Best,
Philip Menchaca
Manager of Grants and Programs
Buddhist Digital Resource Center

Me:
Good master Philip,

again, the Dhamma has an heir and this heir is designed by the Sublime Buddha, who thought with much concern how to prevent the Dhamma for long term for his disciples. This antique law does not allow monks to give anything away which is heritage of the Sangha, does not allow any copy, or place it outwardly. Actually the Sublime Buddha even forbid his heirs to teach those outside the Buddhas original word to avoid that knowledge of lay-people leads to disrespect.
Today, in a pseudob-liberal and global marxistic society it's global thought that the "Economy of the Noble Ones" does not work, and even monks (people who have left common society) have less faith and understanding of it.

Modern ideas are at large based on wrong view, rejecting mother, father, authority, goodness, Sublime... thinking in manners of rights and so hardly get the basic and the point.

And there is no non-profit organisation, if consider honest, in this world to be found aside of the Sangha following the Buddha, yet open to join for whom ever feels inspired to live the Brahmacariya for the benefit of all.

Let good master Philip further more consider that a disciple of the Buddha can not make use of what isn't given, does not hold on rights and what ever is owned by others (even if unrighteous deprived of his ownership), not personally given, is out of range for his.

It's not possible to take whatjs owned by the General Public or what ever common community.

Further, Buddhist, at large, are greatly disinformed, follow advices of Monks having left the tradition, aside of usually (why else would they still hold on house, when so much taught) less faith and firm trust.

Certain there is appreciation for well-meant thought of good master Philip, yet the foundation is outwardly of this different to common community.

My person asks for understanding that he can not approve the depriving of the Dhamma from the Sangha and put it under common ownership, as well as he would not receive it for others within the Parisa as well.

People are free to do what ever they think and the community around the Noble ones may just teach and encourage to be clear of what leads to long term happiness and what to long term suffering, something the text only might not be able, as clear to see in this case.

So again, may person can only encourage to not take part and approve undertakings bringing Sublime and Noble traditions heritage under common creativity, owner-shipp, and simply a means for the belly and gains.

Not sure if my person could reach out to the Good Ministary of Fine Art and the Kings servant in charge of copyurights and heritage, put told them to not approve and support such fatal tendency which they easy could follow, either badly introduced by Monks and/or total new to matters of copy right, and blinded by pseudo-liberality.

If, but that's of course total in the range of him and his undertaking, good Philip can manage to get not only approve by honorable Sangha of this undertaking, but also makes clear that it's author, publisher, owner is the Sublime Sangha of the Buddha, and dedicates it like-a-like, makes such as a service for the Sangha, gives it toward the Sangha, such does not only merit a lot for him but for many, as it will support it's long term dwelling in this world for the welfare of many. Yet it total his to go trusting common or Noble ways and nobody could force or hinder him.

Maybe good to add, good master Philip.

The land of the Khmer (Khema) is currently probability the last Dhammic Kingdom which has not fallen to global tendency of wrong view, is the last country put under the Dhamma-Vinaya, and with modern confusion influence it's maybe already as well subject to decay, as pseudo liberalism and marxism destroys any good and proper relationship and dependency fastly for product-ividy.

My person could in the past get some to mind with similar undertakings, such as Oxfort-University undertaking to put the Sanghayana under Public domain, or "Buddhist" sharing the Khmer Tipitaka under Wikipedia domain... but many, incl. foolish monks, have no faith, thinking Robin Hood was wiser then the Sublime Buddha and the Theras.

Even the teaching of the Dhamna, where, in which circumstances, what, to whom, is strict regulated for this heritage and all not a matter of holding back but simply similar medical drugs need a knowledgeable person to share so that they would turn into harmful means.

It was still virtual tradition that no faithful or knowledgeable lay person would ever keep any Dhamma in his house, but if given or led, would return it to the heirs, into a monastery.

Cultur-thieving and plunder are so common today like land-grapping and taking from the forests, the villagers way, yet wrong stays wrong, even all fall into wrong ways.

Seeing the danger of making ones living on Dhamma and pull it into households, the Sublime Buddha once even warned a semi devoted King not to make trade with the Dhamma, yet not even a point in the past to be clear on the heritage of the Noble Ones toward the ordinary Sangha and lay follower.

One   should not make an effort everywhere,    should not be another's hireling,    should not live dependent on another,    should not go about       as a trader in the Dhamma.
https://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/kn/ud/ud.6.02.than_en.html

បុគ្គលមិនគប្បីប្រឹងប្រែង ក្នុងអំពើលាមកទាំងពួងទេ បុគ្គលមិនគប្បីជាបុរសនៃបុគ្គលដទៃ មិនគប្បីរស់នៅព្រោះអាស្រ័យអ្នកដទៃ មិនគប្បីប្រព្រឹត្តធម៌ (ដើម្បីលាភ) ដូចការជួញប្រែទេ។
https://sangham.net/km/tipitaka/book_052#sut.kn.uda.52

Seeing the fakes an copy-thieving all around, not one not simply seeking for his own or his kinds gain, the wise leaves common society for the welfare of all and prevents the heritage by conducting and becoming himself an Arahat, something this world really soon lacks of.

May good householder see the gift here, and compassion offered, and may he be clear that he hardly would gain any support from common people if dedicating sacrifices toward Sublime and the good for all as there are less who understand that this path is the only win-win solution, starting with Sila and not harming or taking from others for own gain or ones kind. A path that hasn't the world and further suffering as object but independence, real liberation and true security, avoiding and reject fakes and not given copies.

My person fears that the critical time for old tradition has now approached and can only trust that those who are still a little in charge act wise and not biased focusing on there belly and gain feeding of parents, Sublime, heritage for short satisfactions.

[Dhammañāṇa]

Here also the email toward the good Minister and Kings servants. As the Nation is probably already total controlled by google and facebook, and as sangham.net mails are mostly cesured or not delivered, maybe somebody like to try to resend it, to get sure it had been at least told and warned. (Maybe Nyom Moritz , Cheav Villa , Rady ... but only if not seen as burden or troublesome for oneself)

Good valued Minister PHOEURNG SACKONA, valued good Sim Satta, assistants, Upasaka, Upasika,

first of all pardon for uninvited approach and may it be not received without being welcome.

Some weeks ago Atma received the gift of making use of the recource of the Buddhist Digital Resource Center for the Sublime Sangha. Also, Atma got aware that a digitallisation project of the Khmer Sangha heritage has been started, which is general something praiseworthy.
Now, today, Atma got aware that this undertaking heads to deprive the heritage in putting it under Common-zero-licence.
Seeing this possible fatal kammic undertaking, Atma informed the BDRC about the wrong and danger of such undertaking.
Atma also saw that your ministary has been put as supportive Authority for the "Khmer Buddhist heritage Project", but Atma thinks that neither good Minister as well as his team is aware of the undertaking to deprive not only the Sangha from it heritage, but also the Khmer community by such.

Therefore it would be good to possible inform the Organisation as well and try to find ways that the Sublime Texts of the Sublime Buddha and his heirs are not deprived from their heritage, making clear that those texts are the Sanghas heritage, not common good, and to be used proper, with guidance and only for non-trade and skilful (kusala) undertakings and purpose.

Atma trusts that the good Minister and his team finds good solution in respect of the Khema Nation, the Dhamma and the great Kings. In all cases, if it may become a burden, may the approach be put aside and may you go on as thought to be of welfare for yours.

May all your good undertakings always bear their fruits quick and visible so that faith in good prospers to fullness soon.


Attached also the email toward the NGO and link to the occasion of giving at the end:

***
Good Master Philip and team of BDRC,

may person just came across that you release, give, texts, the Dhamma, of the Sangha under a license called C00.

May good master be aware that the Dhamma is heritage of the Sangha, and it's not rightly possible to make such a heritage common good (which, forthermore, can be used for every purpose).
Although such activities, similar of plunder in the west, centuries ago, are very common, yes simply common, itjs actually heavy Kamma, whether aware or not, and based on strong wrong view. Depriving the Sangha from it's means would require to turn down the bowl.

My person urges good master Philip and his team to quickly set measures that such maybe not really considered would not lead to long burdens for you and many.

In the case members of the Sangha gave you such allowance, may good master be aware that they already do no more count as members of the Sangha. Furthermore it is total agains the Dhamma and Vinaya to receive donations and/or making a living in exchange on the Dhamma, since it would lead simply to the corruption of it as well as many, many bad deeds.

May good master Philip and his team understand this urgency as an act of compassion, and of cause, as a matter of circumstances, my person here now returns the offer to make use of your undertakings means.

May you act wise and abound the common for you and many's long benefit.
***

Buddhist Digital Resource Center gave resources toward the Sangha

https://forum.sangham.net/index.php?topic=10579.msg27665#msg27665

[Dhammañāṇa]

As previously given Anumodana  toward main donor, my person thought it to be importand to inform also them, that in cases their gift was thought to reach the Sangha, it would not arrive at this destiny under current circumstances:

Good householder,

Atma came across the circumstances that the digitalization project of the old scripts seeks for depriving the Dhamma from it's heir, the Sangha to put it under common means. As you might not be aware of the heavy kamma conducted by such, out of compassion, here more info on it:

Buddhist Digital Resource Center gave resources toward the Sangha, and rejection.
https://forum.sangham.net/index.php?topic=10579.msg27665#msg27665

May good householder act wisely for long term happiness of many.

Samana Johann
Oral mountain forests

[អរិយវង្ស]

Here also the email toward the good Minister and Kings servants. As the Nation is probably already total controlled by google and facebook, and as sangham.net mails are mostly cesured or not delivered, maybe somebody like to try to resend it, to get sure it had been at least told and warned. (Maybe Nyom Moritz , Cheav Villa , Rady ... but only if not seen as burden or troublesome for oneself)

Good valued Minister PHOEURNG SACKONA, valued good Sim Satta, assistants, Upasaka, Upasika,

first of all pardon for uninvited approach and may it be not received without being welcome.

Some weeks ago Atma received the gift of making use of the recource of the Buddhist Digital Resource Center for the Sublime Sangha. Also, Atma got aware that a digitallisation project of the Khmer Sangha heritage has been started, which is general something praiseworthy.
Now, today, Atma got aware that this undertaking heads to deprive the heritage in putting it under Common-zero-licence.
Seeing this possible fatal kammic undertaking, Atma informed the BDRC about the wrong and danger of such undertaking.
Atma also saw that your ministary has been put as supportive Authority for the "Khmer Buddhist heritage Project", but Atma thinks that neither good Minister as well as his team is aware of the undertaking to deprive not only the Sangha from it heritage, but also the Khmer community by such.

Therefore it would be good to possible inform the Organisation as well and try to find ways that the Sublime Texts of the Sublime Buddha and his heirs are not deprived from their heritage, making clear that those texts are the Sanghas heritage, not common good, and to be used proper, with guidance and only for non-trade and skilful (kusala) undertakings and purpose.

Atma trusts that the good Minister and his team finds good solution in respect of the Khema Nation, the Dhamma and the great Kings. In all cases, if it may become a burden, may the approach be put aside and may you go on as thought to be of welfare for yours.

May all your good undertakings always bear their fruits quick and visible so that faith in good prospers to fullness soon.


Attached also the email toward the NGO and link to the occasion of giving at the end:

***
Good Master Philip and team of BDRC,

may person just came across that you release, give, texts, the Dhamma, of the Sangha under a license called C00.

May good master be aware that the Dhamma is heritage of the Sangha, and it's not rightly possible to make such a heritage common good (which, forthermore, can be used for every purpose).
Although such activities, similar of plunder in the west, centuries ago, are very common, yes simply common, itjs actually heavy Kamma, whether aware or not, and based on strong wrong view. Depriving the Sangha from it's means would require to turn down the bowl.

My person urges good master Philip and his team to quickly set measures that such maybe not really considered would not lead to long burdens for you and many.

In the case members of the Sangha gave you such allowance, may good master be aware that they already do no more count as members of the Sangha. Furthermore it is total agains the Dhamma and Vinaya to receive donations and/or making a living in exchange on the Dhamma, since it would lead simply to the corruption of it as well as many, many bad deeds.

May good master Philip and his team understand this urgency as an act of compassion, and of cause, as a matter of circumstances, my person here now returns the offer to make use of your undertakings means.

May you act wise and abound the common for you and many's long benefit.
***

Buddhist Digital Resource Center gave resources toward the Sangha

https://forum.sangham.net/index.php?topic=10579.msg27665#msg27665

 

កូណាព្រះអង្គ
កូណាប្រើអ៊ីម៉េលsangham ដូចគ្នា

 

[Dhammañāṇa]

 

កូណាព្រះអង្គ
កូណាប្រើអ៊ីម៉េលsangham ដូចគ្នា
Kana Brah Ang,
Kana uses also sangham email.



 

Mudita, if taken refuge. No problem, and no need to take on else or go back, even for such. Understanding is at least a request-duty, not a bring-duty.

[អរិយវង្ស]

កូណាព្រះអង្គ

[Dhammañāṇa]

After seeing that the Deva symbol was removed by someone in the Deva shrine, Atma had to remember that of which ever community isn't dear to remove relics and Sublime heritage for worldly purposes for the heirs place, such common plunder is one main course for soon decay of a community, nation. Why, because not dare to use Sublime for trade and gain, Mara has an ease, the doors of huge corruptions are open and great moral shame decays. Who ever now then would desire to take over such society, say google, Zuckerberg, or who ever, would have success and ease.

Less are those not servants of Mara this days, selling and trading there heritage for their bellies off.

[អរិយវង្ស]