Server space management

[Johann]

It's possible the case that again stressing limits of server space, Nyom Moritz .

Atma thinks it's good to try to clean up a little and main issues are:

 * Delta-chat and multiple stressing of space (as user hardly would clean up their space). No real practical idea, especially of used space by individuals, yet generally tending to search for 1-server (store) solutions.
 * resize images (maybe videos as well). Atma is not sure whether he could manage it via laptop, but via tablet (android), it should be possible to download, resize, upload again.
 * cleaning up double use of space of media files on sangham.net, forum.sangham.net and zze.org. Manual work, one by one. Cleaning up/download section here and relinking zze medias later to sangham.net media files.

[Johann]

Meanwhile Atma tries to remove the content of "storage" folder, (mostly scans of books) and save it on the lap top ( about 7,7 GB) but not sure if it will effect the area of "sangham.net" or has own space restriction.

[Johann]

Meanwhile Atma tries to remove the content of "storage" folder, (mostly scans of books) and save it on the lap top ( about 7,7 GB) but not sure if it will effect the area of "sangham.net" or has own space restriction.

[Moritz]

Vandami, Bhante

I just realized there was a lot of left-over garbage that I had not cleaned up after upgrading DokuWiki. Backup copies from tests etc., including a copy of the whole old DokuWiki. I'm sorry about that. After deleting these no more used test sites now only 60% of space on that server are occupied, 59GB free to use again. (The sangham.net DokuWiki with all its data uses 57GB currently, and I had left a copy there of the data before the upgrade.)

Another space eater is a new feature of the new DokuWiki version that now stores log files (of errors and warnings about possible problems). These logs from October until now have already grown to almost 10 GB. Certainly good to look at what is being logged there about possible problems and fix them, but I have deactivated logging for now, so nothing new is added at the moment. I will try to look through soon what has been logged there and delete the old logs. Seemingly mostly just harmless warnings about code that would not work anymore with future PHP versions, with only few real errors in between.

Summary of main web server:

Total space	150 GB (partially used for operating system etc.)
sangham.net (DokuWiki)	~ 57 GB
forum.sangham.net	~ 7 GB (incl. database)

zugangzureinsicht.org	~ 0.7 GB
forum2.sangham.net - an old try to upgrade the forum into something more mobile-friendly	~ 6 GB (incl. database)
ocr.sangham.net, an old try to build an OCR interface via upload of image files (so far only uploading image files, no OCR performed)	~ 4 GB (images of 17 scanned Khmer books stored here)
Operating system and software	~ 12 GB
Free space	~ 59 GB

Meanwhile Atma tries to remove the content of "storage" folder, (mostly scans of books) and save it on the lap top ( about 7,7 GB) but not sure if it will effect the area of "sangham.net" or has own space restriction.

Both share the same space, together with all the websites except mail.sangham.net.


The e-mail server incl. all the DeltaChat messages is separate, having 50GB allocated for storing all the mail. 80% of that space is currently used. Most space seems to be used for DeltaChat. If auto-delete would be active for all recipients and all of them actually used DeltaChat, this would probably be a good amount less. But for those people who never open DeltaChat the auto-delete will of course also not happen in such cases.
I just deleted all my DeltaChat messages older than 10 months, reducing from 1.3GB to 300 MB, and will also ask Upasika Sophorn whose mail box has grown quite heavy as well after long not looking into, just like me.
A centralized chat storage for group chats, bound to the sangham mail server (one shared mail box for each group), would surely be great for saving space.

* resize images (maybe videos as well). Atma is not sure whether he could manage it via laptop, but via tablet (android), it should be possible to download, resize, upload again.

I could easily do this on the server if knowing what to resize and to what size. But looking for example at user/johann/gallery, which is a large part (11 GB, almost 20%) of all the data on DokuWiki, the images and especially videos seem to be already all quite economically sized.
The next biggest "offenders" are Upasika Villa (4 GB) and I (500 MB), where there is more room for reducing size. I will try to look at it closer soon.

[No Name]

 

I could easily do this on the server if knowing what to resize and to what size. But looking for example at user/johann/gallery, which is a large part (11 GB, almost 20%) of all the data on DokuWiki, the images and especially videos seem to be already all quite economically sized.
The next biggest "offenders" are Upasika Villa (4 GB) and I (500 MB), where there is more room for reducing size. I will try to look at it closer soon.

 

The last time I tries to resize the videos as well.
But pictures   

[Moritz]

I could easily do this on the server if knowing what to resize and to what size. But looking for example at user/johann/gallery, which is a large part (11 GB, almost 20%) of all the data on DokuWiki, the images and especially videos seem to be already all quite economically sized.
The next biggest "offenders" are Upasika Villa (4 GB) and I (500 MB), where there is more room for reducing size. I will try to look at it closer soon.

 

The last time I tries to resize the videos as well.
But pictures   

  Just noting. But nothing wrong with it.
It's not so simple to resize on mobile phone, requiring some extra app and different on each phone.
I think I should try to implement an automatic solution that resizes when uploading.

[Johann]

Sadhu, Sadhu

A lot of free space now. How ever, Atma thinks it's good to focus (himself) on the many not proper put, which is a lot of hard work of course, but at least it's all about reducing burdens and demand of more sacrifices.

Btw. OCR: does it work, as still not having a real avaliable possibility?

[Moritz]

Btw. OCR: does it work, as still not having a real avaliable possibility?

No, it does not work yet.

[Johann]

Aramika  

Ein oder mehrer Beiträge wurden hier im Thema abgeschnitten und damit in neues Thema "Indexing, Search on sangham.net (dokuwiki) " eröffnet, dem angehäng.

One or more posts have been cut out of this topic here. A new topic, based on it, has been created as "Indexing, Search on sangham.net (dokuwiki) " or attached there.