
ព្រះអង្គ Sangham.net បូជា ដល់ព្រះសង្ឃ

មិនមែនបូជាដល់គ្រហស្ថទេ។
Brah Ang, sangham.net (is/has been) sacrificed toward the Sublime Sangha, not sacrificed toward householder.
* Johann : translation added.
That was and is it's purpose, yes. But as it's more and more evident and open seen, that what's holds the status of heirs of the Dhamma, has already long gone for refuge into householders, has no more desire to care for it unless it's for "feeding the poor" everywhere. Both don't like to make efforts and prefer to steal from goverments, Kings, or landlords, to have it maintained by "social care receiver manners" (consumer).
Atma has no desire in leading Unions within this trade of mutual agreements to different ways, and it's burdensome to appear steady like a fool to encourage toward getting to mind, at least even unasked.
Atma has zero desire to further maintain a stand within total stupidy, trade and wrong view and no desire of taking care of a domain not brought into proper place.
One has to leave the "Red Khema" behind, that's all that one can do for them and oneself.
As told, Atma thinks it's good if Nyom, Nyom at least take the given Khmer heritage, and put it in maybe some years further secure and given domain under authority devoted toward the Gems.
Let good Nyom
Moritz as well as good Nyom
Sophorn correspond with Nyom, as yours of course, isn't adviced at all to give up any you may regard as "own land" toward anybody.
* Johann : meanwhile, even Bhante Khemananda had certain joy in giving here into, adviced that he for now better stops to put here into and better seek seclusion, he even rejoiced more and asked to go off into the forest for this day.
Modern Buddhist and monks have AI's, they don't need the Sangha and their heir as Refuge, better, think it's a burden to do sacrifices while there is so much "free" in householder dedicated domains, over google and facebook or suttacentral and github.
Nyom, their leaders, lay and monks, are of the view that labor and donors are the owner, not the Sangha, not the King. All they sacrificed and sacrifice wasn't isn't really sacrificed, but just for the sake of take over an identification, they think that they are worthy and so it's at least for my person good to leave behind the burden.
There is hardly one western householder not claiming being worthy, being Sangha. Total normal outwardly. Big business and "free" given away identification.
If one wouldn't do service as they are used by worthless monks, or if not doing and follow as they wish, a monk maybe sure to get either pulled down robe or banned. People are tread till that extent already, at least children and degenerated are eager taught to have rights.