Aramika
There seems to be a bug in relation with footnotes when using underline syntax. Here a sample having come across:
Footnote 75 gives this link
http://accesstoinsight.eu/en/dictionary/buddhist_dictionary#fn%3Cu%3E75
http://accesstoinsight.eu/en/dictionary/buddhist_dictionary#fn75 (http://accesstoinsight.eu/en/dictionary/buddhist_dictionary#fn<u>75)
Here the source text (http://accesstoinsight.eu/en/dictionary/buddhist_dictionary#sīla (http://accesstoinsight.eu/en/dictionary/buddhist_dictionary#sīla))Code: [Select]==== sīla ====
[[en:dictionary:buddhist_dictionary#sīla|➥]] **[[sīla|sīla]]**:(( __Appendix:__ //[[paccayasannissitasīla|paccayasannissita-sīla]]//, //[[paccāvekkhanasīla|paccāvekkhana-sīla]]//:, etc., are terms used in the Commentary for the proper contemplation (//[[paṭisaṅkhā]]// //[[yoniso]]//) of the 4 requisites of a monk, often dealt with in the old texts (e.g. [[en:tipitaka:sut:mn:mn.002.than|MN 2]]). Also the 3 other //[[pārisuddhisīla|pārisuddhi-sīla]]//, as //[[pātimokkhasaṁvarasīla|pātimokkhasaṁvara-sīla]]//, //[[indriyasīla|indriya-sīla]]//, and //[[ājīvapārisuddhisīla|ājīvapārisuddhi-sīla]]//, though under these names perhaps only known in the Commentary, are fully dealt with in the old texts, e.g. [[en:tipitaka:sut:mn:mn.053.than|MN 53]], [[en:tipitaka:sut:dn:dn.02.0.than|DN 2]], [[en:tipitaka:sut:mn:mn.002.than|MN 2]], etc. The terms //[[pannatti-sīla|pannatti-sīla]]// and //[[paññattisīla|paññatti-sīla]]// are used only in the Commentary)) 'morality', 'virtue', is a mode of mind and volition (see //[[cetanā]]//) manifested in speech or bodily action (see kamma). It is the foundation of the whole Buddhist practice, and therewith the first of the 3 kinds of training (see //[[sikkhā]]//) that form the 3-fold division of the 8-fold Path (see //[[magga]]//), i.e. morality, concentration and wisdom.
...#fn%3Cu%3E1
or
#fn<u>1
There seems to be a bug in relation with footnotes when using underline syntax.
//...//
//...//
What does Nyom Moritz think? Possible an issue of "real/utf url"?