Repeat-off-ender
So guided by a suicide commentator, attached to western philosophy, Nyom Ebo thinks he can purify the t what elders transported till here, out of reason?
My person would dismantle the Thera/therigatha here (was pleased to see sime accounts on the matter some weeks ago, by Bhante Thanissaro), by means of the more fine Dhamma to make the bias visible, since nevertheless it would increase the view on different context, but reduce further faith toward the Sangha. A special the
saddhānusārī would totally cur off by such approaches. Would Nyom lose much if Thag, Thig lands in the basket to put aside, he hold? Why, if
dhammānusārī could it happen to do not trace the "shortcommings", even potent dangers within the collection of Elders "poems"?
There are as well many parts in the other "saddhamma's" "only this is true" area causing easy wrong attention and give food for papanca.
It's not possible to follow the higher correct, the more refined, if the near next isn't right considered penetrated. It lead's sooner or later to the "Channa-punishment" or as told, easy to be caught by Devadattas hosts.
It's not so that destroying the danger of stumps and stones outside make one able to walk barefoot even in a uneven wildness. People who didn't penetrate the basic maths, although able to go fare, using their old merits, if enviroment changes, relay on merits is out of reach there, than they get lost even with simple tasks. So again, importand is the
difficult, but importand friend , no short cuts here.
A main different between the newage-commentors and the old is, that they do not give into putting into aspects to lead on the path back "understand it in this way", but tend to cut of not only faith, but also to challange own defiements and skill to use given without destroying an old culture by replacing natural dangers with labor means of theory.
Did even the Sublime Buddha act in such ways, when seeing a son of good family bowing down to the six directions?
He could, on the risk to uproot any foundation of the young man, have success, yes, but he did not only just praise the safe bet. This so hard to take right view which is connected with merits, for the palast Yogies.
Nyom
Vivek shortly tried the use the
root-sequence teaching also to defend a position. The problem when misusing certain tools is, that althought they work in dependend areas, they leave one by holding on the root instead of understanding that it points toward uprooting the very root and that needs to be made by stages, the raw first. Otherwise finding oneself perceiveless caught in senseobjects, or as forest dweller full of desires, mulas, which eating off the mind. Thats not different here.