Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: April 01, 2023, 11:52:25 AM »People at large don't understand that identification with animal binds, leads to related birth. In pseudo-liberal societies who like the view that all are equal, every moral shame decays.
Animal are not capable to restrain in regard of sensual misconduct. As nice as they may come about, they do not only steal but also kill.
Animal (like) are incapable to grow in Dhamma and so some very sensible and authority areas aren't given to them to avoid dangers for many. Not able to distinguish the different between skilful and desire, a society that has started to focus and sacrifice downwardly is on the road of decay and every righteous person loses all inspiration to give into a society heading towardcanimal states.
Years ago my person asked of what LBGT freaks will approve next, as stilling sensual desires and degeneration knows no end: marriage with and under children? Sex between animals and human. Marriage between animals and human.
It's normal that animals do their joy on village roads, and no good society would feel aversive and punish them, except if a bad neighbors dog jumps on beloves own beauty dog...
While one in "free world" might be able to sue a dog-owner for having let his dog make his dog pregnant, it's to assume that many have nomore chances to get their beloved protected from degenerating tendencies, give up encouragement for efforts to try to work to gain footing in a peaceful and "ordained" society with it's peace also with co-existing border sociaties an different realms.
Stealing, no shame of misconduct and try to copy of what's not at all given, that are outcomes of pseudo-liberal leaders attracting the weak with making "incapacity to a virtue". What one approves, nourishes, grows for one, will be one's chosen slayer.
Metta leaves them on their own, isn't an approve or attachment, love, toward tendencies leading toward bonds and upward. Metta might tell about ways one decides to take, but let them leave the sphere of one's share of food for such. "may yor find the way to happiness by right decisions by yourself". With metta one can leave them behind.
If one wishes to force, to take on control, it would just turn into harming. At least yourself, like a man sitting on a river wishing it flowing upwardly, as he desired to reach higher land with pleasing common support.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10523529/Bidens-pick-nuclear-waste-job-Southern-Baptists-son-turned-drag-queen-Sister-Ray-Dee-OActive.html
Just because people think that giving into pride on low, and equality for the sake of consume, isn't a fatal destructive root.
Growth to more sublime, to liberation, isn't something in common sphere, isn't in the sphere of unrestrained and very strict discrimination between right and wrong, bond strongly to real right way, not a corrupt right or left.
If wishing the favor of bind people, people with animal-equanimity, than you might stay bond right with them and their habits, pleasures and onturning suffering and pain.
Don't one think that those deluded could dwell peacefully with countless and dangerous being in the forests, or unprotected areas with no rights at all, resist only on goodness, or even not.
Immoral defending is an endless, ever ongoing dog and ox-duty practice.
Animal are not capable to restrain in regard of sensual misconduct. As nice as they may come about, they do not only steal but also kill.
Animal (like) are incapable to grow in Dhamma and so some very sensible and authority areas aren't given to them to avoid dangers for many. Not able to distinguish the different between skilful and desire, a society that has started to focus and sacrifice downwardly is on the road of decay and every righteous person loses all inspiration to give into a society heading towardcanimal states.
Years ago my person asked of what LBGT freaks will approve next, as stilling sensual desires and degeneration knows no end: marriage with and under children? Sex between animals and human. Marriage between animals and human.
It's normal that animals do their joy on village roads, and no good society would feel aversive and punish them, except if a bad neighbors dog jumps on beloves own beauty dog...
While one in "free world" might be able to sue a dog-owner for having let his dog make his dog pregnant, it's to assume that many have nomore chances to get their beloved protected from degenerating tendencies, give up encouragement for efforts to try to work to gain footing in a peaceful and "ordained" society with it's peace also with co-existing border sociaties an different realms.
Stealing, no shame of misconduct and try to copy of what's not at all given, that are outcomes of pseudo-liberal leaders attracting the weak with making "incapacity to a virtue". What one approves, nourishes, grows for one, will be one's chosen slayer.
Metta leaves them on their own, isn't an approve or attachment, love, toward tendencies leading toward bonds and upward. Metta might tell about ways one decides to take, but let them leave the sphere of one's share of food for such. "may yor find the way to happiness by right decisions by yourself". With metta one can leave them behind.
If one wishes to force, to take on control, it would just turn into harming. At least yourself, like a man sitting on a river wishing it flowing upwardly, as he desired to reach higher land with pleasing common support.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10523529/Bidens-pick-nuclear-waste-job-Southern-Baptists-son-turned-drag-queen-Sister-Ray-Dee-OActive.html
Just because people think that giving into pride on low, and equality for the sake of consume, isn't a fatal destructive root.
Growth to more sublime, to liberation, isn't something in common sphere, isn't in the sphere of unrestrained and very strict discrimination between right and wrong, bond strongly to real right way, not a corrupt right or left.
If wishing the favor of bind people, people with animal-equanimity, than you might stay bond right with them and their habits, pleasures and onturning suffering and pain.
Don't one think that those deluded could dwell peacefully with countless and dangerous being in the forests, or unprotected areas with no rights at all, resist only on goodness, or even not.
Immoral defending is an endless, ever ongoing dog and ox-duty practice.